ABSTRACT
Objective: Coronary revascularization is associated with better outcomes in coronary artery disease patients. We aim to investigate the prevalence, and factors associated with left ventricular (LV) improvement following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of patients with impaired systolic function with specific reference to the value of baseline GLS. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the records of coronary artery disease patients with impaired systolic function who were admitted and treated with PCI. Result: Out of 420 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients with an impaired systolic function who were admitted and treated with PCI during the period from January 2021 to December 2021, 147 patients (35%) showed no improvement in the Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post PCI and 273 patients (65%) showed improvement of the LVEF post PCI in their follow up echocardiogram. Larger myocardial injury dilated LV dimension at the acute phase showed a strong impact on further improving LV systolic function. Baseline GLS showed a higher statistical difference between the Non-improving LVEF and improving LVEF groups. Moreover, the early GLS and further LV systolic function improvement were strongly correlated (P < 0.001) with higher sensitivity and specificity. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that GLS values greater than 9% are a predictor of significant LVEF improvement in the follow-up stage. Conclusion: Sizable proportion of patients with impaired systolic function following successful PCI show further LV systolic recovery. We demonstrated that the baseline GLS values of more than 9% are an accurate predictor of significant LVEF improvement
ABSTRACT
Objective: Patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) compared to single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) have more comorbidities and poor in-hospital outcomes. We aim to analyze MVDAMI patients regarding clinical data and short-term outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data registry, a single-center study reviewing the clinical details and hospital outcome measures of AMI patients referred to our center for early revascularization from 2016 to 2019. Result: Out of 3041 patients presented with AMI, 491 (16%) had MVD on coronary angiogram. MVD-AMI patients were older, had a higher prevalence of DM, HTN, and prior history of ischemic heart disease compared to the non- MVD -AMI group (p < 0.001 for all). However, they presented more with nonanterior myocardial infarction, showed higher rates of post-myocardial infarction LV dysfunction, and mortality (p < 0.001). Older MVD-AMI patients showed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities and mortality compared to younger ones (p < 0.001). MVD- AMI women and Middle Eastern patients were older and showed a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors compared to MVD-AMI men and South Asian patient population respectively. There were no significant differences recorded among the different subgroups of MVD-AMI patients regarding the hospital outcome measures. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the clinical characters and poor outcomes of a high-risk group of MVD-AMI with different demographic backgrounds. Although age was a strong predictor for in-hospital poor outcomes, neither gender nor ethnicity affected the outcomes in them.